Elliptic curves, Fall 2004, Math 7280
http://www.math.lsu.edu/~verrill/teaching/math7280/index_part2.html

Week 9: Elliptic curves over Fp and Qp.

Week 10 Mordell-Weil finite basis theorem. The weak Mordell-Weil theorem.

Handout with example to help understand the proof of the Mordell theorem.

Lectures this week will be given by Jean and Cristian. They will probably cover approximately chapters 13, 14, 15, setting up a 2 isogeny, and proving the week version of the theorem, that the quotient of C by 2C is finite.

The proof of the Mordell theorem is somewhat algorithmic, and depends on "halving" points. The following picture shows a point R, and four other points P with 2P=R. Notice that the numbers used in writing down R are much bigger than for the other four points.

elliptic curve with points which differ by points of order 2

You can't necessarily "halve" a point and still end up with a rational point. To get a rational point you may need to first add a non trivial representative of E/2E. The first step of the proof of the Mordell theorem is to prove that this group is finite.

Week 11 Mordell-Weil finite basis theorem. Heights.

Monday's lecture was an excursion (because many students were going to be away) - we saw the definition of the j-invariant, and some remarks on the analytic view of elliptic curves. Wednesday Jeremy talked about heights of points on elliptic curves, mostly following Silverman, chapter VIII, section 4, and Plotkin's notes on the Mordell-Weil Theorem. (Though it is sufficient to use Cassels, chapter 16 and 17). Carolyn will then use this to complete the proof of the Mordell theorem.

The second part of the proof of the Mordell theorem involves the concept of height of rational points on an elliptic curve. Here's a picture:

elliptic curve with points which differ by points of order 2

Week 12 Genus 1 curves over Q

Week 13 Student talks

Week 14: No lectures

Week 15 Galois cohomology and the Tate Shaferavich group.