Calendar

Posted December 27, 2025
Last modified April 11, 2026

Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?

Aris Daniilidis, Technische Universität Wien
Variational Stability of Alternating Projections

The alternate projection method is a classical approach to deal with the convex feasibility problem. We shall first show that given two nonempty closed convex sets $A$ and $B$, the consecutive projections $x_{n+1} = P_B(P_A(x_n))$, $n \ge 1$ produce a self-contacted sequence, providing in particular an alternative way to establish convergence in the finite dimensional case [2]. In infinite dimensions, a regularity condition is required to ensure convergence of the above sequence $\{x_n\}_{n\ge 1}$ [4]. In [3], it was established that a regularity condition from [1] also ensures the variational stability of the above method. In this talk, we shall complete this result and show that variational stability is actually equivalent to the aforementioned regularity assumption. REFERENCES: [1] H. Bauschke, J. Borwein, On the convergence of von Neumann’s alternating projection algorithm for two sets, Set-Valued Anal. 1 (1993), 185–212. [2] A. Bohm, A. Daniilidis, Ubiquitous algorithms in convex optimization generate self-contracted sequences, J. Convex Anal. 29 (2022) 119–128. [3] C. De Bernardi, E. Miglierina, A variational approach to the alternating projections method, J. Global Optim. 81 (2021), 323-350. [4] H. Hundal, An alternating projection that does not converge in norm, Nonlinear Anal. 57 (2004), 35–61.

Posted January 2, 2026

Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?

Behçet Açıkmeşe, University of Washington AIAA and IEEE Fellow
Optimization-Based Design and Control for Next-Generation Aerospace Systems

Next-generation aerospace systems (e.g., asteroid-mining robots, spacecraft swarms, hypersonic vehicles, and urban air mobility) demand autonomy that transcends current limits. These missions require spacecraft to operate safely, efficiently, and decisively in unpredictable environments, where every decision must balance performance, resource constraints, and risk. The core challenge lies in solving complex optimal control problems in real time, while (i) exploiting full system capabilities without violating safety limits, (ii) certifying algorithmic reliability for critical guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) systems, and (iii) co-designing hardware and software subsystems for optimal end-to-end performance. Our solution is optimization-based autonomy. By transforming GNC challenges into structured optimization problems, we achieve provably robust, computationally tractable solutions. This approach has already revolutionized aerospace, e.g., reusable rockets land autonomously via real-time trajectory planning, drones navigate dynamic obstacles, and spacecraft perform precision docking, all powered by algorithms that solve optimization problems with complex physics-based equations and inequalities in milliseconds. Emerging frontiers (such on-orbit satellite servicing, multi-vehicle asteroid exploration, large-scale orbital spacecraft swarms, and global hypersonic transport) push these methods further. Yet barriers remain, e.g., handling non-convex constraints, ensuring solver resilience, large-scale optimization for decision making and co-design, and bridging the gap between theory and flight-ready systems. This talk explores how real-time optimization is rewriting the rules of autonomy, and how researchers can turn these innovations into practice, propelling aerospace engineering into an era where aerospace systems think, adapt, and perform at the edge of the possible.

Posted January 24, 2026

Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?

Michael Friedlander, University of British Columbia SIAM Fellow
Seeing Structure Through Duality

Duality is traditionally introduced as a source of bounds and shadow prices. In this talk I emphasize a second role: revealing structure that enables scalable computation. Starting from LP complementary slackness, I describe a generalization called polar alignment that identifies which "atoms" compose optimal solutions in structured inverse problems. The discussion passes through von Neumann's minimax theorem, Kantorovich's resolving multipliers, and Dantzig's simplex method to arrive at sublinear programs, where an adversary selects worst-case costs from a set. The resulting framework unifies sparse recovery, low-rank matrix completion, and signal demixing. Throughout, dual variables serve as certificates that decode compositional structure.

Posted January 5, 2026
Last modified April 10, 2026

Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?

Necmiye Ozay, University of Michigan IEEE Fellow, and ONR Young Investigator, NASA Early Career Faculty, and NSF CAREER Awardee
Fundamental Limitations of Learning for Dynamics and Control

Data-driven and learning-based methods have attracted considerable attention in recent years both for the analysis of dynamical systems and for control design. While there are many interesting and exciting results in this direction, our understanding of fundamental limitations of learning for control is lagging. This talk will focus on the question of when learning can be hard or impossible in the context of dynamical systems and control. In the first part of the talk, I will discuss a new observation on immersions and how it reveals some potential limitations in learning Koopman embeddings. In the second part of the talk, I will show what makes it hard to learn to stabilize linear systems from a sample-complexity perspective. While these results might seem negative, I will conclude the talk with thoughts on how they can inspire interesting future directions.