Calendar
Posted January 28, 2026
Geometry and Topology Seminar Seminar website
1:30 pm 233 Lockett Hall
Nilangshu Bhattacharyya, Louisiana State University
TBA
Posted December 7, 2025
Last modified December 28, 2025
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Richard Vinter, Imperial College London
IEEE Fellow
Control of Lumped-Distributed Control Systems
Lumped-distributed control systems are collections of interacting sub-systems, some of which have finite dimensional vector state spaces (comprising ‘lumped’ components) and some of which have infinite dimensional vector state spaces (comprising ‘distributed’ components). Lumped-distributed control systems are encountered, for example, in models of thermal or distributed mechanical devices under boundary control, when we take the control actuator dynamics or certain kinds of dynamic loading effects into account. This talk will focus on an important class of (possibly non-linear) lumped-distributed control systems, in which the control action directly affects only the lumped subsystems and the output is a function of the lumped state variables alone. We will give examples of such systems, including a temperature-controlled test bed for measuring semiconductor material properties under changing temperature conditions and robot arms with flexible links. A key observation is an exact representation of the mapping from control inputs to outputs, in terms of a finite dimensional control system with memory. (We call it the reduced system representation.) The reduced system representation can be seen as a time-domain analogue of frequency response descriptions involving the transfer function from input to output. In contrast to frequency response descriptions, the reduced system representation allows non-linear dynamics, hard constraints on controls and outputs, and non-zero initial data. We report recent case studies illustrating the computational advantages of the reduced system representation. We show that, for related output tracking problems, computation methods based on the new representation offer significantly improved tracking and reduction in computation time, as compared with traditional methods, based on the approximation of infinite dimensional state spaces by high dimensional linear subspaces.
Posted February 3, 2026
Mathematical Physics and Representation Theory Seminar
1:30 pm – 2:20 pm Lockett 233
Karl-Hermann Neeb, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Coadjoint orbits carrying Gibbs ensembles
Coadjoint orbits are orbits for the action of a Lie group on the dual of its Lie algebra. They carry a natural symplectic structure and are models for homogeneous systems in classical mechanics. Gibbs measures on these orbits provide a natural setting for models of thermodynamic systems. We say that a coadjoint orbit carries a Gibbs ensemble if the set of all $x$, for which the function $\alpha \mapsto e^{-\alpha(x)}$ on the orbit is integrable with respect to the Liouville measure, has non-empty interior $\Omega_\lambda$. We describe a classification of all coadjoint orbits with this property. In the context of Souriau's Lie group thermodynamics, the subset $\Omega_\lambda$ is the geometric temperature, a parameter space for a family of Gibbs measures on the coadjoint orbit. The corresponding Fenchel--Legendre transform maps $\Omega_\lambda$ (modulo central shifts) diffeomorphically onto the interior of the convex hull of the coadjoint orbit $\cO_\lambda$. This provides an interesting perspective on the underlying information geometry.
Posted November 15, 2025
Last modified January 21, 2026
Algebra and Number Theory Seminar Questions or comments?
2:00 pm – 3:00 pm Lockett 233 or click here to attend on Zoom
Marco Sangiovanni Vincentelli, Columbia University
An Euler system for the adjoint of a modular form
Euler systems have proven to be versatile tools for understanding Selmer groups and their connections to special values of $L$-functions. However, despite the key role they have played in making progress toward foundational conjectures in number theory, such as the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer and Bloch–Kato Conjectures, only a handful of provably non-trivial Euler systems have been constructed to date. A significant obstacle to constructing Euler Systems lies in producing candidate Galois cohomology classes. This lecture series presents joint work with Chris Skinner that develops a method to overcome this obstacle. Using this method, we construct an Euler system for the adjoint of a modular form.
Event contact: Gene Kopp
Posted February 9, 2026
Last modified February 10, 2026
Informal Analysis Seminar Questions or comments?
12:30 pm – 1:30 pm Lockett 233
Gustavs Tobiss, Louisiana State University
Bloch's Theorem, Wannierization, and Tight-binding
Posted January 28, 2026
Geometry and Topology Seminar Seminar website
1:30 pm 233 Lockett Hall
Nir Gadish, University of Pennsylvania
TBA
Posted January 15, 2026
Last modified January 16, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Hailey Garcia, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 8, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Lars Gruene, University of Bayreuth
SIAM Fellow
Can Neural Networks Solve High Dimensional Optimal Feedback Control Problems?
Deep reinforcement learning has established itself as a standard method for solving nonlinear optimal feedback control problems. In this method, the optimal value function (and, in some variants, the optimal feedback law also) is stored using a deep neural network. Hence, the applicability of this approach to high-dimensional problems relies crucially on the network's ability to store a high-dimensional function. It is known that for general high-dimensional functions, neural networks suffer from the same exponential growth of the number of coefficients as traditional grid based methods, the so-called curse of dimensionality. In this talk, we use methods from distributed optimal control to describe optimal control problems in which this problem does not occur.
Posted February 10, 2026
Mathematical Physics and Representation Theory Seminar
1:30 pm – 2:20 pm Lockett 233
Milo Moses, Caltech
Four-colorings, recoverability, and topological quantum matter
In ongoing joint work with A. Kitaev, D. Ranard, I. Kim, we have been developing a formalism for exploring topologically ordered quantum states using recovery maps. In this talk, I will explain the potential applicability of these recovery maps to the study of 4-colorings of planar graphs. Conditioned on an unproven technical lemma (which perhaps someone in the audience can demonstrate!), I can show that bridgeless planar graphs quasi-isometric to the Euclidean plane obey a medley of properties reminiscent of topological quantum order.
Posted February 9, 2026
Informal Analysis Seminar Questions or comments?
12:30 pm – 1:30 pm Lockett 233
Basit Abdulfatai, Louisiana State University
Dolapo Onifade, Louisiana State University
Introduction to deep adaptive sampling and physics informed neural networks
Posted January 19, 2026
Geometry and Topology Seminar Seminar website
1:30 pm Virtual
Ettore Marmo, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
TBA
Posted January 15, 2026
Last modified January 16, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Benjamin Appiah, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 12, 2026
Applied Analysis Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm Lockett Hall 232
Daniel Massatt, New Jersey Institute of Technology
TBA
Event contact: Stephen Shipman
Posted November 15, 2025
Last modified January 21, 2026
Algebra and Number Theory Seminar Questions or comments?
2:00 pm – 3:00 pm Lockett 233 or click here to attend on Zoom
Kiran Kedlaya, University of California San Diego
TBA
Event contact: Gene Kopp
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Sayani Mukherjee, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted December 1, 2025
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Khai Nguyen, North Carolina State University
TBA
Posted January 11, 2026
Applied Analysis Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett 223
Zhiyuan Geng, Purdue University
TBA
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Saumya Jain, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 15, 2026
Colloquium Questions or comments?
3:30 pm Lockett 232
Kumar Murty, University of Toronto
TBA
Posted January 5, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Jonathan How, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
AIAA and IEEE Fellow
TBA
Posted January 2, 2026
Last modified January 8, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
10:30 am – 11:20 am Joint Computational Mathematics and Control and Optimization Seminar to Be Held In Person at Location TBA and on Zoom (click here to join)
Jia-Jie Zhu, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm
TBA
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Krishnendu Kar, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Nilangshu Bhattacharyya, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted February 5, 2026
Last modified February 6, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Wonjun Lee, Ohio State University
Linear Separability in Contrastive Learning via Neural Training Dynamics
The SimCLR method for contrastive learning of invariant visual representations has become extensively used in supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised settings, due to its ability to uncover patterns and structures in image data that are not directly present in the pixel representations. However, this success is still not well understood; neither the loss function nor invariance alone explains it. In this talk, I present a mathematical analysis that clarifies how the geometry of the learned latent distribution arises from SimCLR. Despite the nonconvex SimCLR loss and the presence of many undesirable local minimizers, I show that the training dynamics driven by gradient flow tend toward favorable representations. In particular, early training induces clustering in feature space. Under a structural assumption on the neural network, our main theorem proves that the learned features become linearly separable with respect to the ground-truth labels. To support the theoretical insights, I present numerical results that align with the theoretical predictions.
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Anurakti Gupta, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted December 27, 2025
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Aris Daniilidis, Technische Universität Wien
TBA
Posted January 15, 2026
Last modified January 22, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Fabian Espinoza de Osambela, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 2, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Behçet Açıkmeşe, University of Washington
AIAA and IEEE Fellow
Optimization-Based Design and Control for Next-Generation Aerospace Systems
Next-generation aerospace systems (e.g., asteroid-mining robots, spacecraft swarms, hypersonic vehicles, and urban air mobility) demand autonomy that transcends current limits. These missions require spacecraft to operate safely, efficiently, and decisively in unpredictable environments, where every decision must balance performance, resource constraints, and risk. The core challenge lies in solving complex optimal control problems in real time, while (i) exploiting full system capabilities without violating safety limits, (ii) certifying algorithmic reliability for critical guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) systems, and (iii) co-designing hardware and software subsystems for optimal end-to-end performance. Our solution is optimization-based autonomy. By transforming GNC challenges into structured optimization problems, we achieve provably robust, computationally tractable solutions. This approach has already revolutionized aerospace, e.g., reusable rockets land autonomously via real-time trajectory planning, drones navigate dynamic obstacles, and spacecraft perform precision docking, all powered by algorithms that solve optimization problems with complex physics-based equations and inequalities in milliseconds. Emerging frontiers (such on-orbit satellite servicing, multi-vehicle asteroid exploration, large-scale orbital spacecraft swarms, and global hypersonic transport) push these methods further. Yet barriers remain, e.g., handling non-convex constraints, ensuring solver resilience, large-scale optimization for decision making and co-design, and bridging the gap between theory and flight-ready systems. This talk explores how real-time optimization is rewriting the rules of autonomy, and how researchers can turn these innovations into practice, propelling aerospace engineering into an era where aerospace systems think, adapt, and perform at the edge of the possible.
Posted January 15, 2026
Informal Geometry and Topology Seminar Questions or comments?
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Lockett Hall 233
Huong Vo, Louisiana State University
TBD
TBD
Posted January 24, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
10:30 am – 11:20 am Note the Special Seminar Time. Zoom (click here to join)
Michael Friedlander, University of British Columbia
SIAM Fellow
Seeing Structure Through Duality
Duality is traditionally introduced as a source of bounds and shadow prices. In this talk I emphasize a second role: revealing structure that enables scalable computation. Starting from LP complementary slackness, I describe a generalization called polar alignment that identifies which "atoms" compose optimal solutions in structured inverse problems. The discussion passes through von Neumann's minimax theorem, Kantorovich's resolving multipliers, and Dantzig's simplex method to arrive at sublinear programs, where an adversary selects worst-case costs from a set. The resulting framework unifies sparse recovery, low-rank matrix completion, and signal demixing. Throughout, dual variables serve as certificates that decode compositional structure.
Posted January 5, 2026
Control and Optimization Seminar Questions or comments?
9:30 am – 10:20 am Zoom (click here to join)
Necmiye Ozay, University of Michigan
IEEE Fellow, and ONR Young Investigator, NASA Early Career Faculty, and NSF CAREER Awardee
TBA